[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Behaviour of \latinfamily
- To: Rebecca and Rowland <rebecca@astrid.u-net.com>
- Subject: Re: Behaviour of \latinfamily
- From: Alan Jeffrey <ajeffrey@cs.depaul.edu>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:10:47 -0500
- Cc: Alan Jeffrey <ajeffrey@lance.cs.depaul.edu>, fontinst@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Organization: DePaul University
- References: <l03130302b190604cd64b@[194.119.133.41]> <l03130305b18ff73776d2@[194.119.133.37]> <199805260956.LAA18591@attila.uni-duesseldorf.de> <l03130302b190604cd64b@[194.119.133.41]> <l03130301b191fda5938e@[194.119.133.49]> <l03130300b194066ec791@[194.119.133.41]> <l03130301b1952a74a299@[194.119.133.2]> <l03130302b199023a642f@[194.119.133.52]>
- Sender: ajeffrey@cs.depaul.edu
Rebecca and Rowland wrote:
> Right - I think. I take it that `raw variant' is used for the source file
> searching, and `font variant' is used for the output file name?
Yes. Oh the wonderful world of software...
Alan.
--
Alan Jeffrey, Visiting Associate Professor, CTI, DePaul University, USA
Lecturer in Theoretical Computer Science, COGS, University of Sussex, UK
ajeffrey@cs.depaul.edu alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk +1 312 362 8322