[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CM fonts updated?

On Wed, 3 Mar 1999 15:04:16 +0100, Ulrik Vieth wrote:

>Compared to the AMS version of cmex9, the only significant difference
>it is the font identifier ("CMEX" vs. "CMEX V2.2") and some whitespace
>in the source file, which shouldn't affect the generated fonts at all.

Oh, I should have checked this before complaining.  :-(
Yet, thank you for the explanation.

>A similar version conflict also exists for the file ebigof.mf

Oh, this one is really bad!  

Thank you