[metapost] Units unaccuracy with numbersystem set to double
Daniel H. Luecking
luecking at uark.edu
Mon Apr 7 20:12:15 CEST 2014
Friday, April 04, 2014 8:59 AM, Franck Pastor [franck.pastor at mac.com] wrote
>It looks like it is the way to go for the "cm" definition. And "mm" would be
>ideally defined as 360/127 or cm/10 if I understand correctly…
Since cm is produced from (rounded) calculations of 3600/127, cm/10 would
be another rounded calculation on top of that. This has the possibility of
compounding errors. Better would be mm=360/127, which performs a
rounded computation of an exact value.
Dan
--
Daniel H. Luecking
Department of Mathematical Sciences
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
More information about the metapost
mailing list