[tex-k] Re: newer
Reinhard Kotucha
reinhard.kotucha at web.de
Wed Apr 6 22:47:45 CEST 2005
Hi Olaf,
>>>>> "Olaf" == Olaf Weber <olaf at infovore.xs4all.nl> writes:
> Reinhard Kotucha writes:
>> the current version of the program `newer' accepts only two
>> arguments. [...] I added an option --verbose which lists
>> missing input files to stderr.
> One (minor) nit is that it is probably better to list missing
> input files by default and have a --quiet (or -q) option to
> suppress that.
yes, this is much better. I already thought about that but maybe I
was more careful than necessary to preserve the current behavior.
Will you change it or should I send you another patch?
>> Does it make it sense to remove the paragraph beginning with
>> "Although this could be written as a Perl script ..." from
>> web2c.texi?
>> If not, shouldn't we have to explain why it is not written in
>> COBOL?
> Explaining why we didn't use Intercal should be easier.
>From the manual:
INTERCAL's main advantage over other programming languages
is its strict simplicity.
Sounds good!
DO .1 <- "V-':1~:2'c/#1"~#3
DO :1 <- "'V-":1~'#65535c/#0'"c/":2~'#65535
c/#0'"'~'#0c/#65535'"c/"'V-":1~'#0
c/#65535'"c/":2~'#65535c/#0'"'~'#0c/#65535'"
DO (1) NEXT
Cheers,
Reinhard
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-4592165
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the tex-k
mailing list