[tex-k] bld-test-1.1
Peter Breitenlohner
peb at mppmu.mpg.de
Thu Feb 5 11:30:44 CET 2009
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Karl Berry wrote:
> utils/dialog is an exception. There is a (more recent) upstream, but
> unless we want to go through a lot of testing and merging (I don't), we
> should just keep ours. It gets the job done. It is only used in
> texconfig, afaik.
Hi Karl,
and utils/dialog is the only one that needs libs/ncurses (an equally ancient
version with a horrible build system). You once mentioned, that maybe we
should use the installed ncurses library as does texinfo. I certainly would
love to scratch libs/ncurses.
The upstream dialog (e.g., 1.1-20080819) has a reasonably modern build
system. Since people not building dialog (--without-dialog) or skipping
dialog during TL install, will in any case use that version, I don't expect
any significant problems.
An other library I would certainly like to get rid of is libs/libttf
(freetype1), only used by texk/ttf2pk. Last year I tried to convert ttf2pk
to freetype2, however, with little success.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner <peb at mppmu.mpg.de>
More information about the tex-k
mailing list