[tex-k] Incompatibility between WEB and C versions of "ovp2ovf"
Igor Liferenko
igor.liferenko at gmail.com
Mon Mar 14 14:34:53 CET 2016
Hi Akira,
Thank you for the response.
> Probably (MAP ...) part is not necessary in the case where character code is not remapped.
If we consider the behavior of "vptovf" as standard, then "ovp2ovf" is
incorrect, because it behaves differently:
echo "(MAPFONT D 0 (FONTNAME cmr10))" > myfont.vpl
tftopl cmr10 >> myfont.vpl
vptovf myfont.vpl
then check that (MAP ...) part was added:
vftovp myfont.vf
In my previous email there was a small mistake. The following example
is more correct:
echo "(MAPFONT D 0 (FONTNAME cmr10))" > myfont.ovp
tftopl cmr10 >> myfont.ovp
ovp2ovf myfont.ovp myfont.ovf myfont.ofm
wovp2ovf myfont.ovp webfont.ovf webfont.ofm
Regards,
Igor
More information about the tex-k
mailing list