[tex-live] TEXINPUTS problem

Vladimir Volovich vvv at vsu.ru
Sat Oct 16 19:28:42 CEST 2004


"DK" == David Kastrup writes:

 DK> However, neither web2c nor kpathsea are licensed under the GPL.
 DK> The web2c manual has this to say:

 DK> So unless this passage has changed since TeXlive2003, I don't see
 DK> how XeTeX would be forced to come under the GPL.  Either case,
 DK> either the web2c introduction should be amended to remove the
 DK> wrong statement about kpathsea, or the kpathsea introduction
 DK> should be changed to mention the alluded file.  Perhaps this has
 DK> happened since then.

I've read the following in the README file in source/TeX/texk/web2c
directory:

==================
Web2c is free software.  The files I wrote (originally for the Free
Software Foundation) are covered by the GNU General Public License --
see the files COPYING*.  Knuth's original sources are covered by their
own copyright -- see the beginning of tex.web, mf.web, etc.  You can get
the original files on their own from CTAN:/systems/knuth; you can get
MetaPost from ftp://netlib.att.com/netlib/research/metapost.tar.Z
(see also http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/hobby/MetaPost.html).
==================

Also, tex --version says:

TeX 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.3)
kpathsea version 3.5.3
Copyright (C) 1997-2004 D.E. Knuth.
Kpathsea is copyright (C) 1997-2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
There is NO warranty.  Redistribution of this software is
covered by the terms of both the TeX copyright and
the GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the files
named COPYING and the TeX source.
Primary author of TeX: D.E. Knuth.
Kpathsea written by Karl Berry and others.

Nowhere i see the LGPL here. So, it is very well possible that XeTeX
is violating the GPL.

Best,
v.



More information about the tex-live mailing list