[tex-live] Conflict between luatex/babel/luainputenc
Herbert Voss
Herbert.Voss at FU-Berlin.DE
Mon Feb 22 21:50:43 CET 2016
Am 22.02.2016 um 17:53 schrieb Benoit RIVET:
> Le 14 févr. 2016 à 10:37, Benoît RIVET <benoit.rivet at free.fr> a écrit :
>>
>> If I remember correctly, using babel with luatex proved not reliable without luainputenc some years ago, which is why I used luainputenc with the utf8 encoding in the first place. However, testing on some typical documents, I do not find any problem with TexLive 2015, so I guess I can simply erase this line in my documents…
>
> Here is an example, involving french guillemets. When using luainputenc, the quotation marks are printed as expected; which is not the case without luainputenc :
>
> % !TEX TS-program = luaLaTeX
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage[francais]{babel}
> \usepackage[utf8]{luainputenc}
> \usepackage{lmodern}
Without fontspec and without luainputenc it uses
LMRoman10-Regular Type 1C
and with fontspec it uses
LMRoman10-Regular-Identity-H CID Type 0C
However, using fontspec should be the default and then there is
no need for luainputenc
Herbert
>
> \begin{document}
> «French guillemet»
> \end{document}
>
> However, using fontspec, everything compiles fine :
>
> % !TEX TS-program = luaLaTeX
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{fontspec}
>
> \begin{document}
> «French guillemet»
> \end{document}
>
> Other example (euro, german sharp s) are given on
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230268/new-century-schoolbook-font-in-lualatex
>
> Herbert Voss, asked why I needed luainputenc : I need some symbols which are not available without luainputenc, unless I switch to fontspec. Being a happy user of the fouriernc fonts, I have yet to find an Opentype font matching fouriernc. TexGyre Schola is unfortunately not an option : as seen on http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/TeX-Gyre-Schola , the dots on i’s are hardly readable, which is not the case with fouriernc.
>
More information about the tex-live
mailing list