[texhax] learning tex vs latex

Alan T Litchfield alan at alphabyte.co.nz
Wed Oct 28 03:30:59 CET 2009


Bill,

Your time, if considering only those two options, would be better  
spent learning LaTeX. IMHO but YMMV.

They are not divorced however.

Alan

On 28/10/2009, at 3:03 PM, bill lam wrote:

> I'm unfamiliar with both tex and latex. Should my time better spent on
> learning tex or latex?  Presumably learning curve of tex is even more
> steeper than that of latex, but I saw some forum members said they use
> plain tex.  I would like to know before deciding,
>
> 1. Do common packages such as supertabular and cjk work on tex?
> 2. Some said latex is actively developing while tex is not, is that
>   true?
> 3. What will be the advantage of plain tex over latex?
>
> -- 
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> _______________________________________________
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> Mailing list archives: http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/
> More links: http://tug.org/begin.html
>
> Automated subscription management: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
> Human mailing list managers: postmaster at tug.org

--
Alan T Litchfield
AlphaByte
PO Box 141, Auckland, 1140
New Zealand
http://www.alphabyte.co.nz
http://www.alphabyte.co.nz/beatrice



More information about the texhax mailing list