[texhax] ntheorem[amsthm] and amsthm discrepancy
Lars Madsen
daleif at imf.au.dk
Tue Apr 20 14:42:37 CEST 2010
Victor Ivrii wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Lars Madsen <daleif at imf.au.dk> wrote:
>> \theorembodyfont
>
> \theoremstyle{definition}
> \theorembodyfont{\upshape}
> \newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
>
> does not work. Other shape or series does but not this one
read the manual, there is no such thing as \theoremstyle{definition} in
ntheorem, \theoremstyle takes arguments like plain, break, change,
margin, and \theoremstyle{plain} in ntheorem is NOT that same as in amsthm.
What is it you want to do with ntheorem? Do what
\theoremstyle{definition} does in amsthm?
\theoremstyle{plain} % this is the default
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
--
/daleif
More information about the texhax
mailing list