[texhax] ntheorem[amsthm] and amsthm discrepancy

Lars Madsen daleif at imf.au.dk
Tue Apr 20 14:42:37 CEST 2010


Victor Ivrii wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Lars Madsen <daleif at imf.au.dk> wrote:
>> \theorembodyfont
> 
> \theoremstyle{definition}
> \theorembodyfont{\upshape}
> \newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
> 
> does not work. Other shape or series does but not this one

read the manual, there is no such thing as \theoremstyle{definition} in 
ntheorem, \theoremstyle takes arguments like plain, break, change, 
margin, and \theoremstyle{plain} in ntheorem is NOT that same as in amsthm.

What is it you want to do with ntheorem? Do what 
\theoremstyle{definition} does in amsthm?

\theoremstyle{plain} % this is the default
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}



-- 

/daleif


More information about the texhax mailing list