different output for the same file

[Tom Kacvinsky]

I admit to be out of the loop, but does the newer LaTeX/LuaTex/pdftex/XeTeX
handle GPOS table in OpenType
fonts?  That might be a way around the issue, if those features exist.  But
I am not sure if there is an OpenType
font that would meet Paulo's needs.  There is always the STIX Fonts, but I
don't know if the vendor added a
GPOS table.

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:39 PM David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle at gmail.com>
wrote:

> pdflatex produces
>
> ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode character ̧ (U+0327)
> (inputenc)                not set up for use with LaTeX.
>
> as you have used the combining cedilla it;s hard, more or less impossible
> to do anything with combining characters in pdftex.
>
> luatex produces
>
> Missing character: There is no ̧ (U+0327) in font
> [lmroman10-regular]:+tlig;!
>
> as latin modern doesn't have the combining cedilla either
>
> xelatex gives the same warning.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 18:24, Paulo Ney de Souza <pauloney at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Would anyone shed some light why the MWE:
>>
>> ----
>> \documentclass{standalone}
>>
>> \begin{document}
>> Świa̧tek
>> \end{document}
>> ----
>>
>> would produce different outputs between pdfLaTeX, xeLaTeX and luaLaTeX?
>>
>> pdflatex: It does not process and outputs an error.
>> xelatex: Process silently and replace the a-ogonek by an "a".
>> lualatex: Process silently and replace the a-ogonek by an "a"+ space.
>>
>> Paulo Ney
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/attachments/20210604/1c238b38/attachment.html>