Can identical code produce two different .pdf? Awe NiceTabular

[Gerard E. Seibert]

On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 10:34:06 +0100, John C Frain stated:
>When I click on your first link I get messages about tax refunds. Have
>you been hacked.
>
>On Fri 8 Sept 2023, 04:23 Darío via texhax, <texhax at tug.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello! I am confused about this.
>> This behavior in tables using Nice Tabular has been giving me a
>> headache for a long time. I consulted him in tex.stackexchange:
>> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/694224/horizontal-rules-or-not-horizontal-rules-in-nicetabular
>> was closed for unlessclarity.
>>
>> But today I find myself writing a code, and then compile the tables
>> was perfect, as I wanted, ie: vertical lines, double vertical lines
>> and the colors in the rows. For clarity, this file will be called
>> good file.tex
>>
>> Seeing that it worked, I tried copying a code that wasn't working
>> for me to another file, called filebad.tex.
>>
>> I copied the portion that didn't work to the filegood.tex, then
>> compile and perfect! the tables that don't work in filebad work fine
>> in filegood. Is it possible?? It baffles me.
>>
>> Both files it have the same package, the only difference is that
>> filebad is a book and filegood is an article and the book have
>> \tableofcontents ¿?
>>
>> The compilation use this command line (I use geany to compile with
>> F8 key, on Debian 12):
>> latex --file-line-error-style -output-directory=/tmp "%f" && dvipdf
>> /tmp/"%e.dvi"
>>
>> The pdf's file produce for filebad is in [1], and filegood in [2].
>>
>> This is the code for some tables:
>> \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
>> \usepackage{nicematrix}
>> \usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
>> \usepackage{booktabs}
>> \usepackage{float}
>> \begin{document}
>>         \begin{table}[H]
>>         \begin{NiceTabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
>>         \CodeBefore
>>         %\rowlistcolors{1}{red} % sólo la primer fila
>>         \rowlistcolors{2}{red!15,blue!15}
>>         \Body
>>                 \toprule
>>                 Isótopo & Nombre & $Z$ & $A$ & $p^{+}$ & $n$ &
>> $e^{-}$\\\toprule
>>                 \ce{^{80}_{35}Br} & & 35 & 80 & & & 35\\\midrule
>>                 \ce{^{54}_{26}Fe} & & & & 26 & &\\\midrule
>>                 \ce{^{204}_{82}Pb} & Plomo 204 & 82 & & 82 & &
>> \\\midrule \ce{^{131}_{53}I} & & & & & & \\\midrule
>>                 \ce{^{208}_{82}Pb} & & & 208 & & 126 & \\\midrule
>>                 \ce{^{235}_{92}U} & Uranio 235 & & 235 & & &
>> \\\bottomrule \end{NiceTabular}
>> \end{table}
>> \end{document}
>>
>> If I compile only this, really good but in the filebad.tex not; and
>> incredibly in the filegood.tex compile correctly. Really don't
>> understand this behavior.
>>
>> I could share both full codes, they are a bit long and I have
>> separate files, to see if someone can help me to find the error. I
>> repeat both files have identical packages in use.
>>
>> Thanks a lot, apologies if it is not understood, but I do not
>> understand these different behaviors.
>> Darío
>>
>> [1] https://postimg.cc/vcM6x8Yh
>> [2] https://postimg.cc/F7Zkyt14

Both links work fine for me.

-- 
Jerry