[XeTeX] Segmentation fault with xdvipdfmx

[Will Robertson]

On 10/07/2006, at 20:49 , Jonathan Kew wrote:

> On re-reading your previous message, I realized that the font must
> have been different, as it did include glyph names in the 'post'
> table. So that's why you didn't see an access violation. I guess XP
> ships a version of the font with a format 3 'post' table, while W2K
> had format 2.
> ...
> So much for interoperability....

Yeah. Ages ago for fun I tried installing Palatino Linotype in my TeX  
distribution.
The various tools worked well for the Win2k version, but failed with  
the WinXP one.

I don't see it as anything different, on the whole, as Apple's  
removal of various font tables for the fonts it distributes.

Will