[XeTeX] No underdot in Adobe Garamond Pro?

[Ulrike Fischer]

Am Wed, 6 May 2009 16:13:51 +0530 schrieb Shrisha Rao:

> Greetz.
> 
> For some reason, the usual \d{} command of LaTeX produces an erroneous  
> symbol when used with the Adobe Garamond Pro font.  The plain (non- 
> Adobe) Garamond screws up even the overlines.  Latin Modern Roman  
> shows both perfectly (as do Computer Modern, Palatino, and the  
> classical LaTeX fonts).  Attached is an example showing this problem.   
> Any suggestions welcome.  TIA.

That's a known problem. xunicode declares a certain definition for
\d (and other accents commands) which can fail if the font doesn't
contain the necessary glyph(s). See e.g. the following discussion
from january:

http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2009-January/011701.html


-- 
Ulrike Fischer