[XeTeX] (Off-topic) STIX Fonts
Andrew Moschou
andmos at gmail.com
Sun May 30 18:26:57 CEST 2010
Not really. The glyphs in the mathematical alphabets have different shapes
to the glyphs in the text alphabets. I believe unicode-math is able to
define the alphabets (I don't actually know, but I can't imagine any
hindrance), with or without OpenType math tables, so using unicode-math
would be superior to using mathspec here.
Andrew
On 31 May 2010 01:31, Michael Lynch <michael.s.lynch at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> If you were to use the STIX fonts in the meantime, given the lack of
> OpenType features in the STIX release, does it make more sense to use
> mathspec instead of unicode-math?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20100531/f08d67a9/attachment.html>
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list