[XeTeX] Performance of ucharclasses

[Vafa Khalighi]

I can not comment on the difference between "discouraged" and "prohibited"
since I am Persian not British but certainly if I am "discouraged from
modifying a package", I feel that "I am  prohibited from modifying that
package".

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) <
P.Taylor at rhul.ac.uk> wrote:

>
>
> Vafa Khalighi wrote:
>
>  Yes, firstly because it does not make the software free any more (not just
>> free in price but also free in modification, etc) and secondly LPPL never
>> discourage you from modifying the software.
>>
>
> I don't think you are understanding my question, Vafa : I am
> not querying whether they are inconsistent in spirit -- which
> clearly they are -- but in terms of actual requirements.  Since
> you are only "discouraged from" and not "prohibited from"
> making changes, I believe that a court of law would find that
> there is no actual inconsistency in practice.
>
>
> Philip Taylor
>
>
> ------------------------------**--------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>  http://tug.org/mailman/**listinfo/xetex<http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20111023/a0e68995/attachment.html>