[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: revised report of EuroTeX math font BOF
- To: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>, Maths Fonts Discussion list <math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: revised report of EuroTeX math font BOF
- From: "Y&Y, Inc." <support@YandY.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 06:38:52 -0400
At 11:13 AM 98/04/15 +0200, Thierry Bouche wrote:
>i'm very pessimistic about what could be a `plain tex interface' as a
>typical plain tex file may contain things like {\textfont0\char124} or
>\mathchardef\decimalsep\if@french"013B\else"013A\fi
For what it is worth, we supply LucidaBright and MathTime fonts
with plain TeX and LaTeX 2.09 support as well. Some people use them
that way. But is true that the probability of running into hard-coded
OT1 assumptions (or worse) is higher. But note that this happens
with some `LaTeX 2e' code as well...
Regards, Berthold.