[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binary Relations, draft 1
- To: Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>
- Subject: Re: Binary Relations, draft 1
- From: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:09:42 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Content-Length: 644
Hans
> However, the rule is certainly known in the US -- it says something about
> that functions and variable should be typeset this or another way (or have
> forgotten the exact wording),
Very likely it is known.
> and it is always used.
By every US publisher? Or every one except the AMS?
So exclude the US if you wish, but it is not a common convention[1] in
UK pure maths nor has it been in the last few decades: ie since our
heir to the throne (the one with the ears) was an undergraduate, to be
very precise.
[1] Not `a rule', as we have none here (except about unimportant
things such as inheriting thrones, of course).
chris