[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fontinst 1.801 -- still worse

**** On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:03:04 +0100 (BST), "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> said:

 > Apparently so far only the people who developed the fontinst
 > stuff were using it seriously, and they already know all the
 > details, which are _not_ explained in the documentation ;-)

SR> evidence to the contrary is Alan Hoenig, who does not really class as a
SR> fontinst developer, but who certainly understands it

SR> but i concede there may be some truth in your remark...

Well, I use fontinst, and I wouldn't dream of getting involved in
development... It *is* unfortunate that so many of the details are omitted
from the documentation, but I've managed to use fontinst to set up several
of my Type 1 font families for use with TeX.



Fernando Q. Gouvea                      
Department of Mathematics               Editor, MAA Online
Colby College                           http://www.maa.org
fqgouvea@colby.edu                      http://www.colby.edu/math

Important Latin Phrases:    Furnulum pani nolo.
     (I don't want a toaster.)