[tex-k] Patch: engine --version gives uncommon version sequence

[Olaf Weber]

Karl Berry writes:

>     What I don't know is why
>     the current method was chosen (I inherited this aspect of the code).

> Geez.  I see my first ChangeLog entry for printversion is back in 1996.
> 8 years ago, there was no real attempt at integrating all these
> different engines.  In fact the term "engine" itself had not come into
> existence.

> Regularizing the --version output sounds like a good idea to me.

I'll put it in then.

-- 
Olaf Weber

               (This space left blank for technical reasons.)