[tex-k] Bug#266718: [tex-live] Bug#266718: dvips font inclusionbroken inTeXlive

[Norbert Preining]

Hi Kakuto-san,

(reply back to the lists, maybe someone else has an idea)

what a pain, I am really surprised ...

On Don, 03 Mai 2007, Akira Kakuto wrote:
> The only difference is the final
> </usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb>

Yup, do you have any idea where this can come from?

> Very sorry I cannot understand the reason.
> I send you my config.ps, config.pdf, alt-rule.pro, special.pro,
> tex.pro, texps.pro and texc.pro (My config.ps uses texc.pro
> instead of tex.pro).   (files.zip)

My idea was to search for differences in the files to understand/find a
different reason why here always this problems exhibits.

Unfortunately to no avail, I used your config.pdf, tex.pro, texc.pro,
... and still the same effect.

The only thing which now keeps me up is the question why here, with all
versions/variants of dvips, get this additional line of inclusion of
cmr10.pdf.

My psfonts.map contains simply
	cmr10 CMR10 <cmr10.pfb

do you have the same definition of fonts?

Otherwise I don't see why the freshly compiled dvips behaves
differently.

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at>                    Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining at debian.org>                         Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MELCOMBE REGIS (n.)
The name of the style of decoration used in cocktail lounges in mock
Tudor hotels in Surrey.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff