[tex-k] [tex-live] Bug#266718: Bug#266718: dvips font inclusionbroken inTeXlive

[George N. White III]

On 5/3/07, Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at> wrote:

> Hi Kakuto-san,
>
> (reply back to the lists, maybe someone else has an idea)
>
> what a pain, I am really surprised ...
>
> On Don, 03 Mai 2007, Akira Kakuto wrote:
> > The only difference is the final
> > </usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb>
>
> Yup, do you have any idea where this can come from?
>
> > Very sorry I cannot understand the reason.
> > I send you my config.ps, config.pdf, alt-rule.pro, special.pro,
> > tex.pro, texps.pro and texc.pro (My config.ps uses texc.pro
> > instead of tex.pro).   (files.zip)
>
> My idea was to search for differences in the files to understand/find a
> different reason why here always this problems exhibits.
>
> Unfortunately to no avail, I used your config.pdf, tex.pro, texc.pro,
> ... and still the same effect.
>
> The only thing which now keeps me up is the question why here, with all
> versions/variants of dvips, get this additional line of inclusion of
> cmr10.pdf.
>
> My psfonts.map contains simply
>         cmr10 CMR10 <cmr10.pfb
>
> do you have the same definition of fonts?

My dvips looks for psfonts_t1.map.  I put one in the directory with
the test files
that has:

cmr10 CMR10 <cmr10.pfb
cmsy10 CMSY10 <cmsy10.pfb

> Otherwise I don't see why the freshly compiled dvips behaves
> differently.

I have a debian system (testing, so lacking the glibc needed for the latest
debian texlive) with both the debian texlive and the "real" 20070212 texlive
(I can switch using the very nice environment modules system).

I see the 3 using either the debian or the "real" version.  If I use
my normal map files in "real" texlive the "3" is missing.  This might
be related to using the lm-rep maps.

-- 
George N. White III <aa056 at chebucto.ns.ca>
Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia