[tex-live] pattern memory size

[Olaf Weber]

Karl Berry writes:

>>     You need to do both, because anything larger than ssup_trie_size is
>>     automatically downgraded during the executable's initialization phase.

> Yep, got that.  My question is whether increasing ssup_trie_size will
> have other inadvertently bad consequences, like something ends up being
> a four-byte array index or some such implementation craziness.

> I can just try it if need be, but I thought it would be prudent to ask
> first :).

It looks like it should be safe to icrease trie_ssup_size (it is
already a 3-byte value).  My first suggestion would be moving from
262143 (@"3FFFF) to @"3FFFFF (4194303).

-- 
Olaf Weber

               (This space left blank for technical reasons.)